![]() ![]() ![]()
|
ECP: INTRODUCTION
ECP: CLINICAL RESPONSE
Clinical experience indicates patients have demonstrated significant
improvement after external counterpulsation treatment such as: (Weisfogel et al 2001) recently reported that for a group of 58 patients,
CCSF class was reduced from 2.67 to 1.71 (36%). Overall, 84% of the
patients (49 of 58) experienced a reduction in their CCSF classification,
while 16% of the patients (9 of 58) showed no improvement. In addition,
91% of the patients experienced a reduction in their anginal episodes
per 24 hour period post-treatment. Of the 24 patients who had been hospitalized
in the six months prior to treatment, only one (4%) required hospitalization
in the six month period after treatment. Medication consumption also
decreased 77.4%. The paper concluded that ECP significantly reduces
CCSF angina class, the incidence of anginal episodes, hospitalization
for angina and anti-anginal medication use.
Lasting Perfusion Benefits
(Lawson et al 1995) reported that follow-up with many patients that
have had initial improvement, those benefits were sustained at a 3-year
follow-up. Improved myocardial perfusion of ischemic areas as demonstrated
through thallium-201 imaging suggest these patients may have responded
to the therapy via enhanced coronary collateral development or function
(See images below).
|
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |